Hyun-Joong (Daniel) Kim

Associate

kim-hyun-joong-Full
  • JD, New York University School of Law, 2014; Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, articles editor
  • BSE (Biomedical and Electrical Engineering), cum laude, with distinction, Duke University, 2009; Tau Beta Pi

Qualifications

  • New York, 2015

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2015
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 2015
  • Korean (Native)
  • Tau Beta Pi
  • American Bar Association

Hyun-Joong (Daniel) Kim

Associate

Hyun-Joong (Daniel) Kim joined the intellectual property litigation group in 2014.

Daniel’s practice is focused primarily on patent litigation. He has represented clients in several fields, including software, automotive technology, and medical devices companies.

Daniel earned his B.S.E. degree from Duke University with dual majors in Biomedical and Electrical Engineering, where he worked as a researcher in the Biomedical Interferometry and Optical Spectroscopy (BIOS) Research Group under the guidance of Dr. Wax, with a particular focus on spectroscopy and signals. Daniel received his law degree from New York University School of Law, where he served as articles editor for the NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law

Experience

  • Certain L-Tryptophan, L-Tryptophan Products, and Their Methods of Production (337-TA-1005) – Defending CJ CheilJedang adverse to its competitor Ajinomoto in a two-patent dispute relating to genetically-modified bacteria for the production of L-Tryptophan. Secured initial determination of no violation of Section 337 at trial, with the presiding Administrative Law Judge finding both patents to be invalid and not infringed and that Ajinomoto failed to satisfy the domestic industry requirement.
  • Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular, LLC (D. Mass.) – Represented Abiomed in a matter relating to an intravascular blood bump.
  • Allure Energy, Inc. v. Honeywell International Inc. (W.D. Tex.) – Member of the team defending Honeywell International Inc. in a patent infringement litigation involving smart thermostats.
  • CardioNet, LLC et al. v. Mednet Healthcare Techs., Inc., et al. (E.D. Pa.) – Member of the team that subsequently prevailed in proving contempt of the consent judgment by co-defendant MedTel24, Inc. Appeal dismissed.
  • CardioNet, LLC et al. v. the ScottCare Corp., et al. (E.D. Pa.) – Represents plaintiffs in a patent infringement litigation involving five patents directed to remote cardiac monitoring devices.
  • Invista North America S.a. R.I. v. Hanwha Corporation (TTAB) – Successfully defended our client in an opposition proceeding, permitting Hanwha to register its word-and-design mark for renewable energy services.

Publications

  • Assisted, Tyler K. Drake, Francisco E. Robles, and Adam Wax, “Multiplexed low coherence interferometry instrument for measuring microbicide gel thickness distribution,” App. Opt. 48, D14-D19 (2009)