In a Managing Intellectual Property article, IP litigation partner Matt Rizzolo discussed half-year key patent trends.
Matt noted several key patent rulings from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit including Lashify v. ITC, where the court found that the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) applied a legally incorrect understanding of the test for the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The ruling overturned the ITC’s practice of excluding expenses related to sales, marketing, warehousing and distribution from its analysis of the economic prong. The ITC has filed a petition for en banc review but is currently applying the decision.
In Recentive Analytics v. Fox Corporation, the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision that Recentive’s machine learning patents were ineligible under Section 101. Matt notes that many AI-related patents could be at risk under the test for Section 101. The case is being appealed to the full Federal Circuit.
Stay Up To Date with Ropes & Gray
Ropes & Gray attorneys provide timely analysis on legal developments, court decisions and changes in legislation and regulations.
Stay in the loop with all things Ropes & Gray, and find out more about our people, culture, initiatives and everything that’s happening.
We regularly notify our clients and contacts of significant legal developments, news, webinars and teleconferences that affect their industries.