Alert

Recommended Alerts

Sign Up For Alerts

CMS Proposes Revised Definition of Medicare Part D Drug “Negotiated Prices”: Rule Could Increase Predictability for Pharmacies and Lower Medicare Enrollee Drug Cost-Sharing but Increase Premiums

On January 6, 2022, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a proposed rule entitled “Medicare Program; Contract Year 2023 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs” (the “2022 Proposed Rule”). Of great significance to Medicare Part D plan sponsors, pharmacies, and beneficiaries, the 2022 Proposed Rule includes proposed changes to the way Medicare determines the “negotiated price” (i.e., the price upon which beneficiary cost-sharing is based at the pharmacy counter), and consequently could affect Part D plan sponsors’ reporting of costs to CMS. If finalized in its current form, the 2022 Proposed Rule could enhance predictability of cash flow for pharmacies, reduce out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for Medicare Part D enrollees, and lead Part D plan sponsors to raise premiums, thereby causing increased competition among Part D plan sponsors for beneficiaries. The 2022 Proposed Rule would take effect on January 1, 2023. Comments on the rule are due by March 7, 2022.

Read More

New CMS Guidance Clarifies Medicare Coverage for Clinical Trial Services


Time to Read: 1 minutes Practices: Health Care

Printer-Friendly Version

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued guidance earlier this week, clarifying Medicare coverage for services provided in clinical trials. Specifically, CMS is applying to clinical trials the general Medicare principle that Medicare will not pay for services for which neither the beneficiary nor any other party has any legal obligation to pay. The application of this principle calls into question Medicare coverage for clinical trial services when a sponsor has agreed to pay for the services to the extent the services are not covered by insurance (which language has previously raised concerns under Medicare secondary payer rules in the research injury context). CMS does, however, affirm Medicare coverage for clinical trial services when a provider waives charges or the collection of beneficiary cost-sharing amounts (such as co-pays) for such services for patients who are indigent. Finally, CMS reminds providers that payment by a research sponsor for beneficiary cost-sharing amounts in a clinical trial raises fraud and abuse concerns.

Providers involved in clinical trials and research sponsors should consider their clinical trial funding, budgeting and/or billing practices in light of the new CMS guidance.

If you have any questions about this guidance, please contact Eve Brunts, Terry Coleman or your usual Ropes & Gray attorney. 

Printer-Friendly Version

Cookie Settings