Alert

Recommended Alerts

Sign Up For Alerts

Large IRAs and High-Income Retirement Savers Targeted by Amendment to Budget Reconciliation Bill

Last week, Richard Neal (D-Mass), chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, unveiled an amendment to help fund the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation legislation that is currently under consideration in Congress. The Neal amendment would make dramatic changes to the rules governing retirement plans for certain high-income taxpayers by imposing new asset limitations and prohibitions. It would also require distributions and IRA contribution limitations for certain individuals with retirement savings over $10 million, require distributions of Roth balances in excess of $20 million and end the practice of so-called “back-door” Roth conversions. These changes aim to effectively prohibit mega IRAs, which were the subject of extensive press reports earlier this year following ProPublica’s revelation of multiple large IRAs, including Peter Thiel’s $5 billion mega-Roth IRA.

Read More

Section 162(m) Reminder: Shareholders May Need to Reapprove Certain Compensation Plans Every Five Years


Time to Read: 1 minutes Practices: Tax

Printer-Friendly Version

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits to $1 million the deduction that certain publicly held corporations may claim in any year for compensation to the CEO or any of the three most highly paid named executive officers other than the CEO or the CFO. An important exception makes the deduction limitation inapplicable to “performance-based” compensation under qualifying shareholder-approved plans.

The Section 162(m) regulations require that, where an arrangement depends upon the achievement of specific performance goals set by the compensation committee from among performance criteria approved by the shareholders, the material terms of the arrangement—including the performance criteria—must be disclosed to and reapproved by the corporation’s shareholders not less frequently than every five years.

Corporations should review their plans intended to qualify for the performance-based exception from Section 162(m) to determine if shareholder action needs to be taken in an upcoming proxy season. For companies that had performance-based plans approved in 2005, the disclosure and reapproval would generally need to occur this year (2010). 

*  *  *

The rules under Section 162(m) are detailed and complex, and the above reminder relates to only one of the many potentially applicable rules. If you have any questions regarding Section 162(m), please contact one of the attorneys listed above, any member of the Tax & Benefits Department or your usual Ropes & Gray advisor.

 

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:
To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version

Cookie Settings