Intellectual Property Litigators Weigh In on Supreme Court Opinions on Attorneys’ Fees in Highmark and Octane
Intellectual property litigation partner James Batchelder (Silicon Valley) spoke with Bloomberg BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, Law360, and The Recorder about the implications of the Supreme Court’s April 29 opinions in Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System Inc. and Octane Fitness LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc., two closely watched cases concerning attorneys’ fees in patent actions.
Click on the links below to read articles. (Subscriptions required)
- Patent Trolls To Think Twice After High Court Rulings
- Lawyers Weigh In On High Court's Patent Rulings
- Supreme Court Reverses Federal Circuit On Exceptional Case Merit, Review Standards
- Supreme Court Eases Fee Shifting in Patent Cases