Gabrielle E. Higgins


  • JD, Fordham University Law School, 1989
  • BA, College of the Holy Cross, 1985


  • California
  • New York
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Court Admissions

  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • California Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section
  • Silicon Valley Intellectual Property Law Association
  • International Trademark Association
  • The Recorder’s 50 Women Leaders in Tech Law (2014)
  • Silicon Valley Business Journal’s Women of Influence list (2013)

Gabrielle E. Higgins


Gabrielle Higgins is an IP litigation partner in Ropes & Gray’s Silicon Valley office. She is a trial lawyer with 25 years of experience litigating complex patent cases involving diverse subject matter ranging from telecommunications and semiconductors to software and the Internet. She tries cases for industry-leading companies and has extensive experience representing high-tech clients before the Federal Courts and the International Trade Commission. Gaby has also been counsel in over 20 Patent Office Inter Partes Review proceedings, and has obtained winning results in final written decisions for her clients.


  • Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. A Leading Korean Consumer Electronics Company et al. (E.D. Texas/W.D. Texas, N.D. California): Representing a major Korean electronics company in a multi-defendant patent infringement cases alleging infringement of patents relating to systems and methods for communicating media content. Successfully transferred the cases from E.D. and W.D. Tex. to the N.D. Cal. and stayed them pending the outcome of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.
  • A Leading Korean Consumer Electronics Company (IPR2014-00209, IPR2014-00212, IPR2014-00407, IPR2014-00408, IPR2014-01181, IPR2014-01182, IPR2014-01184). Filed IPR petitions challenging three litigated patents generally relating to the delivery of Internet media content to a portable device. The PTAB issued final written decisions finding all challenged claims of the ‘390, ‘007 and ‘641 patents unpatentable.
  • In the Matter of Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles, Related Software, and Components Thereof, Investigation No. 337-TA-752 (ITC): As trial counsel in the ITC for Motorola, obtained determination of infringement on two patents asserted against Microsoft’s Xbox 360.
  • Motorola v. Microsoft (W.D. Wisconsin/W.D. Washington): As trial counsel in Seattle Washington for Motorola, litigating patent, contract and FRAND actions involving the Xbox 360 and Windows.
  • Broadcom v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. (C.D. Cal.) – Defended a major semiconductor company in a patent infringement case involving analog circuit technologies, cryptography, and secure authentication.
  • Smart Memory Solutions v. Panasonic et al. (N.D. California): As litigation counsel for Fujitsu, obtained early settlement in multi-defendant patent litigation involving microcontrollers with flash memory.
  • OPTi Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices (E.D. Texas): As trial counsel for AMD, defended litigation over patents relating to processors and chipsets. The case settled favorably for AMD, shortly before it would have been submitted to the jury.
  • v. NCsoft Corp. (E.D. Texas/N.D. California): Successfully concluded litigation over patents directed to multiplayer online games, after transferring case from E.D. Texas to N.D. California.
  • Linear Technology Corp. v. Impala et al. (N.D. California): Represented LTC in six-party litigation over patent related to switching voltage regulators in which LTC won settlement valued in excess of $100 million.
  • Linear Technology Corp. v. Micrel, Inc. (N.D. California): Trial counsel for LTC in litigation over patent for transistor drive circuitry. Obtained judgment that LTC’s patent was valid, enforceable, and infringed.



  • Speaker, “Winning on Either Side of the “v.”: How to Succeed as a Patent Challenger or Defender,” Ropes & Gray and the ACC on Post-Grant Patent Challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Conference (January 13, 2016)
  • Panelist, “Looking Back to Move Forward: CBM and IPR Proceedings and their Intersection with Patent Litigation,” American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Spring Meeting, Los Angeles, CA (April 30, 2015)
  • Speaker, “Patent Challenges at the USPTO: Advanced Practice Tips for Making Effective Use of Invalidity Trial Proceedings,” ACC-SFBA’s 3rd Annual Institute for Advanced Corporate Counsel (iACC), San Francisco, CA (April 10, 2014)
  • Speaker, “Latest Developments in IP Litigation & More,” Institute for Advanced Corporate Counsel (iACC) 2.0 - Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), Santa Clara, CA (May, 2013)
  • Speaker, “Ropes & Gray West Coast Lunchtime Legal Briefing Teleconference - Patent Litigation Before The ITC: Recent Developments And Trends,” March 2013
  • Speaker, “Year in Review: 2012 Patent Litigation Legal Landscape and Lessons Learned,” Association of Corporate Counsel - Bay Area Chapter (January 2013)
  • Speaker, “News from the IP Front: The Federal Circuit’s Akamai Opinion and Updates on the America Invents Act,” Ropes & Gray Asia Morning Briefing Teleconferences (September 2012)
  • Speaker, “News from the IP Front: The Federal Circuit’s Akamai Opinion and Updates on the America Invents Act,” Ropes & Gray CLE Seminar, Silicon Valley (September 2012)
  • Panelist, “What You Need To Know About Mobile Patent Wars,” Association of Corporate Counsel - Bay Area Chapter (July 2012)
  • Multi-Defendant Patent Litigation: Front Line Strategies for Success,” SVAGC 22nd All Hands Meeting, Santa Clara, CA (2010)
  • The First Step is the Hardest: Responding to Claims of Infringement,” Association of Corporate Counsel, Palo Alto and San Francisco, CA (2010)
  • Northern District of California: What Works and What Does Not,” Venue Based Patent Litigation Strategies,” PLI, San Francisco, CA (July 2010)
  • Panelist,“Litigation Makes Strange Bedfellows,” Association of Corporate Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Chapter, San Francisco and Palo Alto, CA (July 2009)