Recommended Alerts

Sign Up For Alerts

En Banc Federal Circuit Defines The Rule Of Divided Infringement

On August 13, 2015, the Federal Circuit rendered what is now its second en banc ruling in Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., expanding on the scope of what constitutes divided infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) of patented method claims (i.e., where direct infringement involves the performance of the various steps of a method by different actors). This case was previously heard en banc in 2012 and has already been to the Supreme Court and back in 2014.

Read More

Consultation Period for Rules of Procedure for the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Practices: Intellectual Property

Printer-Friendly Version

On 25 June, 2013, the Preparatory Committee for the EU Unitary Patent System published its draft Rules of Procedure for the Unified Patent Court. U.S. and international companies can now comment on the rules. Read the alert to find out how. 

The Committee is now soliciting public comment through 1 October, 2013. Comments should be submitted to the following address:

As we have discussed previously, the new Unitary Patent Court and its Rules of Procedure will substantially influence European patent litigation strategies for plaintiffs and defendants. Certain rules will be particularly important to U.S. and international companies. These include rules related to bifurcation, stay and injunctions, opting out of UPC jurisdiction, interplay between EPO oppositions and UPC revocation, and costs of proceedings and damages.

For questions about how the new EU System and its Rules of Procedure will impact your business or how to present comments to the Committee, please contact your usual Ropes & Gray attorney or one of the following Ropes & Gray attorneys: Anita Varma, Richard McCaulley, Christopher Harnett, Edward Kelly, Charles Larsen, and Christopher Carroll.                         

Printer-Friendly Version