行政诉讼

Ropes & Gray stands up for its clients when they need to stand up to their regulators. From challenging U.S. federal and state regulations to defending against government lawsuits, we help clients successfully navigate complex – and often costly – administrative litigation.


Experience

Our work involving judicial review of federal laws, rules, and regulations includes:

  • Wollschlaeger v. Governor, State of Florida – Represented three national medical organizations and six physicians in a successful First Amendment challenge to Florida law that prevented doctors from speaking freely with patients about gun safety. (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 2011; currently on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.) 
  • United States v. Caronia – Represented the Medical Information Working Group in its participation, as amicus, in a successful challenge to the FDA's prohibition against “off-label promotion.”  (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2011)
  • Project Vote/Voting For America, Inc. v. Long – Represented Project Vote/Voting for America in its successful claim that the National Voter Registration Act required the release of voter registration application records that had been withheld by a Virginia General Registrar. (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 2010)
  • Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence v. Salazar et al. – Represented Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence in its successful challenge, under the National Environmental Protection Act, to a U.S. Department of the Interior regulation allowing firearms in national parks. (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 2009)
  • Physicians for Human Rights v. Department of Defense – Represented Physicians for Human Rights in litigation to compel the U.S. Department of Defense to release information about a mass gravesite in Afghanistan, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 2009)