| Court - Judge Name |
Effective Date |
Applicable To | Categories |
Summary |
| D. Colo. - Judge S. Kato Crews | 12/1/2024 | Generative AI | Generative AI Usage | Judge Crews has updated his standing orders for civil cases to require that any motion filed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 or 56, or any opposed motion, contain a certification stating whether generative AI was using “in preparing the filing.” Filings must certify either that “no portion of the filing was drafted by AI,” or that any language drafted by AI—even if later edited by a human—was personally reviewed for accuracy and correct citations using traditional legal databases. The court will strike filings that fail to include this certification. |
| Requires Disclosure and/or Verification | ||||
| Applies to AI Used for Research | ||||
| Applies to AI Used for Filings/Drafting | ||||
| D. Colo - Magistrate Judge Susan Prose | 10/21/2024 | Generative AI | Generative AI Usage | Magistrate Judge Prose’s standing order requires that filings contain a certification regarding either the use or the non-use of gen AI “(such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, Google Bard, etc.) in preparing the filing, including any proposed amended pleadings.” The preparer of the filing must certify that either no portion of the filing was drafted by gen AI or that any language drafted by AI, even if later edited by a human, “was personally reviewed by the filer or another human being for accuracy using print reporters or traditional legal databases and attesting that the legal citations are to actual existing cases or cited authority.” The order states that the court will strike any filing that does not include a certification. |
| Requires Disclosure and/or Verification | ||||
| Applies to AI Used for Filings/Drafting |
Colorado
Jump to:
