| Court - Judge Name |
Effective Date |
Applicable To | Categories |
Summary |
| Ky. Ct. App. – Judge Susanne M. Cetrulo | 3/28/2025 | Generative AI | Generative AI Usage | In Salyer v. Salyer, 2025 Ky. App. LEXIS 160 (Mar. 28, 2025), Judge Cetrulo criticized a party for “cit[ing] two non-existent” cases in his briefing, noting that although the court issued a show cause order “suspecting that [AI] was used to obtain case citations that do not exist,” the party’s response to that order that “did not fully alleviate [the court’s] serious concerns.” The court categorized this sort of behavior as a “failure to follow briefing requirements,” citing Kentucky Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(A)(4), warning that such failure “could result in sanctions in future appeals,” although the court did not elect to impose sanctions at this time. |
| Suggests Cautious Use of AI | ||||
| Applies to AI Used for Filings/Drafting |
Kentucky
Jump to:
